After scoring wins for same-sex
marriage rights and anti-discrimination protections, U.S. equality advocacy
groups now find themselves in a battle over bathrooms.
North Carolina last week became
the first state to enact a law requiring transgender people to choose restrooms
that match the gender on their birth certificate rather than the one with which
they identify.
At least 13 other states also
have considered so-called bathroom bills targeting the transgender community
this year, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The
measures, which have sparked heated debate between supporters and opponents
about privacy and safety expectations, have had mixed results in statehouses.
"Most of these bills didn’t
even make it to a committee vote," said Cathryn Oakley, senior legislative
counsel for the Human Rights Campaign, a lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
advocacy organization. "They’re such a bad idea, they didn’t actually go
anywhere."
In North Carolina, the key
exception, Republican Governor Pat McCrory has defended his state's law.
"Legislation was passed to
protect men, women and children when they use a public restroom, shower or
locker-room," he said in a statement on Tuesday. "That is an
expectation of privacy that must be honored and respected."
South Dakota's Republican
governor, however, vetoed legislation earlier this month that sought to dictate
what bathrooms transgender students could use in public schools. A similar bill
in Tennessee appears stalled in committee, though opponents are awaiting a
hearing on the matter next week.
Measures also failed last year in
eight states that tried to restrict access to sex-segregated facilities based
on birth gender, the National Conference of State Legislatures said.
This year's proposals are among
the nearly 200 anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender bills civil rights
organizations are tracking across the country, a record that is about twice as
many as in 2015, Oakley said.
BATHROOM WARS
Bathroom wars have a long history
in the United States. Jim Crow laws, which enforced racial segregation on state
and local levels in the South, forced African Americans to use restrooms that
were separate from those used by whites into the mid-1960s.
The latest fight is unfolding
along with legislation introduced after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year
legalizing same-sex marriage.
Social conservatives have pushed
measures allowing people to deny services to lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender men and women on the grounds of religious beliefs.
Governors in Georgia and Virginia
vetoed such bills this week, saying they could have allowed state-sanctioned
discrimination.
North Carolina's new law goes
beyond what bathrooms transgender people are allowed to use.
As part of the measure, lawmakers
also established a statewide nondiscrimination policy that protects people on
the basis of race, religion, color, national origin and biological sex but not
gender identity and sexual orientation. The law effectively blocks local
governments from passing their own anti-discrimination ordinances that include
those broader protections.
That leaves the lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender community vulnerable to discrimination at work and
public places such as hotels and restaurants, said Wake Forest University law
professor Shannon Gilreath. He called the measure the most anti-gay legislation
in the United States.
"Bathrooms are such a small
part of it," said Gilreath, an expert on gay rights issues. "Gays and
lesbians have been robbed of so much more."
McCrory said the claims that
anti-discrimination protections have been eroded are untrue. North Carolina,
which now faces a federal lawsuit over the law, has been the target of a
"vicious, nationwide smear campaign," he said.
It is unclear how the state's
bathroom provision will be enforced. The law establishes no penalties for
violators, though legal experts and lawmakers suggested charges could be issued
under trespassing or public nuisance statutes.
Rose Saxe, senior staff attorney
at the American Civil Liberties Union, said state agencies, public schools and
universities will have license to act as "potty police."
"Who gets asked to provide
their papers before going into a bathroom is left unknown," she said.
(Reporting by Colleen Jenkins;
Editing by Diane Craft)
No comments:
Post a Comment